Register Log-in Investor Type

In the press

Investment trust insider on permanent capital vehicles

Investment Trust Insider on Perpetual Income and Growth

Investment trust insider on permanent capital vehicles – James Carthew: backfiring buybacks can be a permanent waste of shareholder capital

I put a comment in last week’s article about Syncona (SYNC) that I thought might attract more attention than it did. Talking about the importance of having cash to back up the financing needs of the companies it was investing in, I said this investment trust must be prepared to refuse demands for share buybacks even if it traded on a discount for a while.

We love jargon in our industry and all the different names we have come up for our funds – investment trusts, investment companies, closed-end funds – illustrate that. When you talk to asset managers from outside the industry though, the term that they tend to use is permanent capital vehicles.

Many investment managers see a big upside in having a fixed pool of capital to invest. They believe they will get to take a long-term view and hold illiquid investments, without having to worry about having to liquidate the portfolio in a hurry.

They will find it easier to be contrarian and buy when others are selling and, perhaps most importantly, they think they can be patient and worry less about short-term underperformance of a benchmark.

Lastly, for some asset managers, there is a hope that having some permanent capital will enhance the value that others place on their own businesses.

I think the investment company sector’s record of long-term outperformance relative to equivalent open-ended funds can be attributed, at least in part, to the ability to hold less liquid investments including small caps, as well as to use gearing.

read more here

Please review our cookie, privacy & data protection and terms and conditions policies and, if you accept, please select your place of residence and whether you are a private or professional investor.

You live in…

You are a…