Looking to bounce back
Foresight Environmental Infrastructure’s (FGEN’s – formerly JLEN Environmental Assets) recent results were a two-part affair, with its operational assets pumping out record cash receipts, but the NAV taking a hit as green hydrogen developer HH2E entered administration (a form of bankruptcy where a third party manages the company to pay creditors).
The failure of HH2E, which could not attract the required investment to bring forward its projects, exposes the risk of investing at an early stage of development in a nascent sector. However, the highly diversified nature of FGEN’s portfolio meant that the impact on NAV was just 2.6%.
The stability provided by FGEN’s successful operational portfolio, which makes up 92% of assets, enables it to take measured exposure (calculated risk) to potential gains from construction-stage assets (see our profile on page 10). This gives the manager confidence that FGEN will bounce back strongly in time. The 10.4% dividend yield offers shareholders a compelling reason to wait.
Progressive dividend from investment in environmental infrastructure assets
FGEN aims to provide its shareholders with a sustainable, progressive dividend (a dividend expected to grow over time), paid quarterly, and to preserve the capital value of its portfolio. It invests in a diversified portfolio of environmental infrastructure projects generating predictable wholly or partially index-linked cash flows. Investment in these assets is underpinned by a global commitment to support the transition to a low-carbon economy.

At a glance
Share price and discount
FGEN’s discount to NAV widened substantially since October as firstly the UK budget raised concerns of inflationary pressures and a higher-for-longer interest rate narrative grew, then latterly the announcement that HH2E had fallen into administration. Before this, FGEN’s discount had been narrowing. Over the year to 31 October 2024, FGEN’s shares traded in range of a 12.1% and a 30.2% discount to NAV, and averaged a discount of 19.5%.
Time period 31 October 2019 to 12 November 2024

Source: Morningstar, Marten & Co
Performance since launch
FGEN’s NAV returns over the past two years have been flat despite substantial headwinds that have faced it and the renewable energy infrastructure sector over the period, including higher discount rates used to value FGEN’s assets.
Time period 31 October 2019 to 31 October 2024

Source: Morningstar, Marten & Co
12 months ending | Share price TR (%) | NAV total return (%) | Earnings per share (pence) | Adjusted EPS (pence) | Dividend per share (pence) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
31/03/2020 | 6.3 | (0.7) | (2.1) | 6.5 | 6.66 |
31/03/2021 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6.7 | 6.76 |
31/03/2022 | 7.3 | 34.1 | 30.6 | 7.0 | 6.80 |
31/03/2023 | 12.2 | 13.1 | 14.9 | 6.7 | 7.14 |
31/03/2024 | (15.8) | (1.8) | (2.1) | 7.5 | 7.57 |
Interim results
Cash from operational assets at record high
FGEN, renamed from JLEN Environmental Assets Group in September, has announced interim results, reporting a total NAV of £720.1m or 109.8p per share as of 30 September 2024 – a 3.3% decline over the six-month period. Factoring in dividends of 3.9p, this equated to a flat 0.04% NAV total return in the period.
The fall in NAV was mainly due to the full write-down of its investment in HH2E, a German developer of green hydrogen projects that went into administration in November 2024. This reduced FGEN’s NAV by 2.6% (explored further below).
Distributions (income from its investments) received from projects reached a record £46.6m for the half-year, surpassing last year’s record of £46.2m, and provided a dividend coverage ratio of 1.23 times (the amount by which distributions cover dividend payments). The portfolio’s value dropped by £85.3m over the period, primarily due to portfolio sales and the HH2E write-down.
Figure 1: FGEN portfolio valuation in £m, as at 30 September 2024

Source: FGEN, Marten & Co
HH2E administration
FGEN invested £19.3m into HH2E
FGEN invested €22.3m (£19.3m) into HH2E through Foresight Hydrogen Holdco GmbH. Other HH2E shareholders included funds managed by Foresight Group, HydrogenOne Capital Growth, and the founders and employees of HH2E.
HH2E had been progressing toward securing a bankable offtake agreement (a legally binding agreement ensuring hydrogen sales, which financiers typically require to approve funding) for hydrogen production before making a Final Investment Decision on its most advanced project in Lubmin, Germany. During the summer of 2024, HH2E sought senior lenders and equity investors, but no party was willing to commit without the agreement in place.
FGEN does not expect to recover any of the capital
FGEN and Foresight Group considered providing additional funding to allow HH2E to meet its obligations. However, the board ultimately decided against it due to concerns over risk and capital allocation in the current market environment. Unable to secure other funding, HH2E filed for insolvency on 11 November 2024.
FGEN’s €22.3m (£19.3m) investment, representing 2.6% of its NAV as of 30 September 2024, was primarily allocated to securing orders for long-lead-time equipment and developing green hydrogen sites at Lubmin and Thierbach. FGEN’s manager does not expect to recover any of this capital.
FGEN decided against investing further capital in HH2E
It is a disappointing outcome for what had the potential to be a profitable investment in the emerging green hydrogen sector. As previously discussed, green hydrogen holds significant promise for decarbonising industrial processes and heavy transport sectors. FGEN’s manager remains convinced of its long-term importance in the clean energy transition but acknowledges that the development of the hydrogen market has been slower than anticipated. The projects were at too early a stage to secure the necessary institutional investment.
The manager explains that, having already committed almost £20m to HH2E, further increasing exposure without a signed offtake agreement represented an unacceptable risk. The scale of the additional funding required made the decision even more challenging.
The investment in HH2E is the only development-stage investment in the FGEN portfolio (we detail construction stage assets, which make up 8% of the portfolio, in the asset allocation sector). The underlying performance of FGEN’s portfolio was strong, recording record cash of £46.6m over the six months to 30 September.
Market backdrop
Reaction to the budget and the HH2E news has seen FGEN’s discount widen to 32.2%
The budget announcement at the end of October caused gilt rates to increase in the UK, as concerns grew that Labour’s fiscal policies could prove to add inflationary pressures to the UK economy and interest rates would remain higher for longer than previously anticipated. This resulted in the share prices of alternative investment trusts, including FGEN, to fall from their already depressed levels, and discounts to widen further. FGEN’s discount to NAV at 28 November was 32.2% (from around 15% pre-budget – although the HH2E announcement likely played a large part too – see page 15 for more detail on FGEN’s discount).
Labour government positive for renewable energy sector
The change in UK government has been positive for the renewable energy sector, as evidenced by planning restrictions for onshore wind in England being loosened and the 50% increase in the CFD budget (contracts for difference – the government’s primary mechanism for supporting new low carbon power infrastructure, which works by guaranteeing a set price for electricity that generators receive).
The fundamental growth story for the sector remains strong, with supportive green energy transition policies from most global governments (especially in the UK and Europe) requiring trillions of pounds of investment over the next 20 years.
Other drivers of returns
Outside of the HH2E write-down, the other factors that impact FGEN’s NAV were relatively stable over the past six months. We detail these factors and their sensitivities below, beginning with power prices.
Power prices
Power prices have been relatively stable over the last six months, having fallen back significantly following extraordinary highs during 2022 and early 2023, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: UK power prices

Source: Bloomberg – UK baseload
FGEN’s exposure to electricity and gas price fluctuations has been carefully managed, with proactive measures in place to stabilize income. Here’s a summary of the key factors influencing its portfolio’s performance:
The marginal change in forecasts for future electricity prices and gas prices compared to forecasts at 31 March 2024 increased FGEN’s NAV by £0.2m in the six months to the end of September 2024.
Fixed prices secured on the majority of portfolio
FGEN looks to de-risk its exposure to market prices and has fixed prices for the majority of its output. At 30 September 2024, the portfolio had price fixes secured at 60% for the Winter 2024/25 season and 43% for Summer 2025 season.
The war in Ukraine (heightened by the US permitting Ukraine the use of US long-range missiles into Russian territory) and the rapidly escalating Middle East crisis could create further volatility for oil and gas prices with risks to the valuation related to power price assumptions both to the upside and the downside.
An increase in electricity and gas prices of 10% would add £41.1m (or 6.3p) to NAV, and a 10% fall in power prices would take off £39.0m (or 5.9p).
FGEN’s manager states that in the extreme event that electricity prices more than halved to £40/MWh (megawatt hour – they are currently at around £85/MWh), the company would maintain a resilient dividend cover for the next three financial years, albeit with reduced headroom by year three.
Discount rates
UK gilt yields have remained at elevated levels for a sustained period since government borrowing costs rose sharply in 2021 and 2022, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Long-term (10-year and 30-year) UK gilt yields

Source: Bloomberg, Marten & Co
The weighted average discount rate now sits at 9.5%
No macroeconomic drivers or project-specific factors prompted changes to the discount rates used to value FGEN’s portfolio over the six months to 30 September 2024. However, FGEN’s weighted average discount rate moved out slightly to 9.5% (from 9.4%). This was primarily due to an increase in the value of assets in construction (which are valued using higher discount rates to reflect the increased risk versus operational assets).
There was no change to NAV resulting from changes to the discount rate.
A reduction in the discount rate of 0.5% would result in an uplift in value of £23.8m (or 3.6p per share), while a downward movement in the portfolio valuation of £22.9m (3.5p per share) would occur if discount rates were increased by the same amount.
Inflation
Inflation assumptions remained static
60% of FGEN’s forecasted revenues are contractually linked to inflation (as measured by the Retail Price Index – RPI) through government-backed subsidies and long-term contracts. Inflation assumptions used to value FGEN’s portfolio (based on actual data and independent forecasts) remained the same at 3.5% RPI inflation for 2024, reverting to 3% until 2030, and then falling to 2.25% thereafter. This resulted in no movement in FGEN’s NAV over the six-month period to the end of September.
Figure 4: UK RPI year-on-year (%)

Source: ONS, Marten & Co
Figure 4 shows that RPI inflation rose to 3.4% in October 2024; however, the potential for inflation to increase further following the chancellor’s budget at the end of October has grown. FGEN’s sensitivity to changes in the inflation rate is about +£21.6m or 3.3p on the NAV for every 0.5% increase in the forecast inflation rate and a decrease of £21.9m or 3.3p on the NAV if rates were reduced by the same amount.
Taxation
As we discussed in more detail in previous notes (links to which can be found on page 16), the UK government introduced a temporary windfall tax on electricity generators – the Electricity Generator Levy (EGL) – in response to higher energy prices. FGEN’s wind, solar and biomass assets are affected by the levy, which saw the government take 45% of revenues above a price of £75/MWh from 2023 to April 2024, and thereafter adjusted each year in line with inflation (as measured by CPI) on a calendar-year basis until the levy comes to an end on 31 March 2028.
A sum of £3.3m was set aside for the EGL tax in FGEN’s latest interim accounts. This compared to £5.2m in the same period in 2023. The manager estimates that the annual liability for the 2025 financial year will be lower, reflecting the drop in power price forecasts year-on-year.
Asset allocation
Figure 5: Portfolio value split by sector, as at 30 September 2024
Figure 6: Portfolio split by remaining asset life as at 30 September 2024

Source: FGEN, Marten & Co
Source: FGEN, Marten & Co
Figure 5 displays FGEN’s portfolio by project type, as at 30 September 2024. In aggregate, at that date there were 42 projects spread across the wind, AD (anaerobic digestion – a process that breaks down organic waste without oxygen to produce biogas and digestate), solar, waste & bioenergy, hydro, controlled environment, and low carbon & sustainable solutions technologies. The weighted average remaining asset life of the portfolio was 16.5 years, although the manager feels it is being conservative in this area.
The majority of its portfolio (90%) is located in the UK, with the 10% outside the UK accounted for by FGEN’s Italian, German and Norwegian investments.
Figure 7: Portfolio split by operational status as at 30 September 2024
Figure 8: Net present value of future revenues by type as at 30 September 2024

Source: FGEN, Marten & Co
Source: FGEN, Marten & Co
At 8%, FGEN’s construction exposure is not excessive. These projects offer the potential for NAV uplifts as the projects become operational and the discount rate applied to them can be reduced as they become de-risked.
Following the failure of HH2E, the manager is keen to stress that there is no read across to the company’s construction-stage assets. These are further along the construction phase and do not exhibit the same degree of risk that HH2E did. Here we have profiled FGEN’s non-energy assets that are either in construction or are in the ramp-up phase.
CNG Foresight
FGEN has invested £26.3m (with a further £2.3m of capital committed) into a portfolio of 15 biomethane refuelling stations for compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles in the UK, operating under the brand CNG Fuels. 13 are operational, while a further two are currently under construction. Revenues are earned from sales of biomethane fuel to customers under contract – which include several of the largest fleet operators in the UK – with the price of gas passed through to the customer, meaning that FGEN has no exposure to underlying merchant gas prices.
Transport operators are heavily incentivised to reduce carbon emissions, with the sector being the largest source of emissions in the UK (accounting for 34% in 2019). The manager says that HGVs fuelled by biomethane generated by anaerobic digestion plants are the only commercially-available, at-scale solution to substantially reduce these emissions – achieving more than an 85% reduction in CO2 emissions. The government has committed to maintaining a clear advantage for gas-powered vehicles until 2032.
Potential ramp-up in revenues as CNG vehicle usage grows
The prospect for a ramp-up in revenues is tied to the growth of transport fleets using CNG vehicles. There are promising signs that growth is coming through, with 48% uplift in gas dispensed from CNG Fuels sites in the 12 months to September 2024. Meanwhile, Tesco has committed to significant growth in its CNG fleet with new truck orders.
A key development in the CNG sector could come to fruition in the next 12 months, and with it a significant opportunity to reach new customers. Vehicles that use CNG fuel are currently limited to smaller trucks, but larger-capacity CNG vehicles are being trialled and could open up a far larger market. These larger vehicles require up to 50% increase in gas per vehicle, compared to the smaller trucks.
The Glasshouse
The Glasshouse is a controlled-environment facility set on a 4-hectare site that lawfully cultivates tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) flowers under a UK government issued licence, which are sold to established UK-based pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Offtake contract in place for medicinal cannabis supply
Phase one of construction of the Glasshouse, which is co-located with an existing FGEN AD facility that supplies low-carbon heat and power via a private wire, completed in September 2023, allowing for around 12,000kg of plant to be grown per annum. A major offtake contract is in place with Releaf, the UK’s fastest-growing medical cannabis provider, in a multi-million-pound deal to supply cannabis-based products for medicinal use to Releaf’s patients and resulted in the first-ever patient to receive prescribed medical cannabis from a flower grown in the UK, ending the reliance on imported flower.
Ramping-up of operations is expected to complete in 2026, with new offtake partners being sought. The scheme is set to achieve breakeven performance in 2025. Longer-term, there is scope to undertake phase two of construction to facilitate increased output of up to 100%.
Rjukan
Rjukan is a land-based trout farm in Norway that uses recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) technology to recirculate pure, clean mountain water. The manager says that the technology is the most sustainable, scalable, and environmentally conscious form of aquaculture production available today. The facility is capable of producing 8,000 tonnes of trout (or 22,000,000 dinners) per year which is to be sold to European and international salmonid markets.
Set to complete in 2025, with double-digit return expected
The project is partially operational, with the first fish tanks constructed and first eggs delivered in January 2024. Construction remains ongoing for later-life areas of the facility. Construction is expected to complete by the end of 2025, with the first trout harvest expected at a similar timeframe. Marketing has begun and the manager says that interested offtakers have been identified.
FGEN has invested £35.8m in the project, with a further £4.5m committed, and the manager expects the project to achieve a low double-digit return once fully operational.
Portfolio activity
In August, FGEN sold a 51% stake in a portfolio of six AD assets to the operator Future Biogas for £68.1m (in line with their book value). FGEN retained a 49% holding in the assets, which have a combined generating capacity of 38MW, allowing it to benefit from the future growth and income generated by the portfolio.
The proceeds of the sale were used to repay some of the company’s RCF – reducing gearing to 28.7% – and to fund a £20m share buyback programme.
The manager says that it will look to make further selective divestments to recycle capital and further reduce drawings on the RCF.
Performance
FGEN’s NAV returns over the past two years have been flat despite substantial headwinds that have faced it and the renewable energy infrastructure sector over the period, including higher discount rates used to value FGEN’s assets.
Figure 9: FGEN NAV TR over five years to 31 October 2024

Source: Morningstar, Marten & Co. NB with effect from 1 May 2021, Morningstar’s NAV estimate includes an estimate of accrued income
Figure 10: FGEN cumulative performance to 31 October 2024
3 months (%) | 6 months (%) | 1 year (%) | 3 years (%) | 5 years (%) | 10 years (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGEN NAV total return | (1.2) | 0.0 | (1.5) | 34.6 | 46.3 | 110.4 |
FGEN share price total return | (8.6) | (2.9) | 8.6 | 1.4 | (2.1) | 55.4 |
Source: Morningstar, Marten & Co
Peer group
You can access up-to-date information on FGEN and its peers on the QuotedData website.
FGEN has one of the broadest remits of the 21 companies that comprise the members of the AIC’s renewable energy sector. Most of these funds are focused on solar or wind or some combination of the two. Three of these funds are focused solely on energy storage.
There is variation of geographic exposure within the peer group too, with a number of funds that are heavily exposed to the North American market (which has a different risk/reward structure). Atrato Onsite Energy is in the process of liquidating, having agreed a deal to sell its entire portfolio in early November. Aquila Energy Efficiency is in managed wind-down. Harmony Energy Income is seeking buyers for its portfolio.
Figure 11: AIC renewable energy infrastructure sector comparison table, as at 28 November 2024
Market cap (£m) | Premium/(discount) (%) | Yield(%) | Ongoing charge (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FGEN | 490 | (32.2) | 10.4 | 1.24 |
Aquila Energy Efficiency | 43 | (45.1) | 8.7 | – |
Aquila European Renewables Income | 209 | (26.1) | 8.7 | 1.10 |
Atrato Onsite Energy | 115 | (14.8) | 7.2 | 1.80 |
Bluefield Solar Income | 578 | (22.5) | 9.2 | 1.02 |
Downing Renewables & Infrastructure | 135 | (33.2) | 7.4 | 1.60 |
Ecofin US Renewables Infrastructure | 45 | (36.5) | 1.7 | 1.78 |
Foresight Solar | 456 | (28.0) | 9.9 | 1.15 |
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund | 258 | (51.5) | 13.7 | 1.42 |
Greencoat Renewables | 788 | (22.6) | 7.9 | 1.18 |
Greencoat UK Wind | 2,858 | (19.9) | 7.9 | 0.92 |
Gresham House Energy Storage | 287 | (54.1) | 10.9 | 1.19 |
Harmony Energy Income | 117 | (45.5) | 0.2 | – |
HydrogenOne Capital Growth | 31 | (76.4) | 0.0 | 2.56 |
NextEnergy Solar | 413 | (26.9) | 11.9 | 1.11 |
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure | 390 | (32.2) | 8.6 | 1.16 |
Renewables Infrastructure Group | 541 | (45.7) | 12.7 | 1.02 |
SDCL Energy Efficiency Income | 2,235 | (25.2) | 8.3 | 1.04 |
Triple Point Energy Efficiency Infrastructure | 45 | (26.2) | 12.2 | 2.06 |
US Solar Fund | 108 | (40.5) | 5.1 | 1.39 |
VH Global Energy Infrastructure PLC | 268 | (39.6) | 8.4 | 1.39 |
Peer group median | 268 | (32.2) | 8.6 | 1.19 |
FGEN rank | 6/21 | 10/21 | 6/21 | 11/19 |
Source: Morningstar, Marten & Co
FGEN is one of the larger funds within this peer group, and the substantial de-rating of its shares over the last month (following the HH2E news) has seen its discount to NAV move from one of the narrowest in the sector to middle of the pack. Although disappointing, we believe that the limited exposure of the investment (2.6% of NAV), the diversification of its wider portfolio, and the fund’s long-term record – ranking highly in NAV terms over longer periods – make its current discount to NAV attractive.
Wide discounts have distorted yields across the sector. Nevertheless, FGEN’s yield is highly attractive. Its ongoing charges ratio ranks middle of the pack, but is expected to fall when the impact of a reduction in the management fee is felt going forward.
Figure 12: AIC renewable energy infrastructure sector performance comparison table, periods ending 31 October 2024
3 months(%) | 6 months(%) | 1 year(%) | 3 years(%) | 5 years(%) | 10 years(%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGEN | (1.2) | 0.0 | (1.5) | 34.6 | 46.3 | 110.4 |
Aquila Energy Efficiency | (0.0) | (0.0) | (1.0) | (0.3) | n/a | n/a |
Aquila European Renewables Income | 3.7 | (1.3) | (10.7) | 4.9 | 16.0 | n/a |
Atrato Onsite Energy | 1.6 | 3.2 | 1.9 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Bluefield Solar Income | (1.1) | (2.5) | (1.1) | 30.3 | 51.2 | 135.8 |
Downing Renewables & Infrastructure | 1.3 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 32.3 | n/a | n/a |
Ecofin US Renewables Infrastructure | (1.2) | (20.4) | (30.1) | (22.5) | n/a | n/a |
Foresight Solar | (0.3) | 1.7 | 1.9 | 30.5 | 44.1 | 106.9 |
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund | 1.9 | (2.2) | (2.8) | 22.0 | 56.6 | n/a |
Greencoat Renewables | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 31.9 | 42.7 | n/a |
Greencoat UK Wind | 1.2 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 45.7 | 72.6 | 172.3 |
Gresham House Energy Storage | (0.1) | (16.4) | (24.7) | 9.3 | 40.2 | n/a |
Harmony Energy Income | 0.0 | (1.4) | (16.0) | n/a | n/a | n/a |
HydrogenOne Capital Growth | (2.7) | (2.7) | (0.6) | 2.7 | n/a | n/a |
NextEnergy Solar | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 21.7 | 30.3 | 92.7 |
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure | 0.1 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 22.4 | n/a | n/a |
Renewables Infrastructure Group | 0.1 | (1.9) | (1.6) | 25.6 | 43.5 | 122.1 |
SDCL Energy Efficiency Income | 1.8 | 3.5 | (4.3) | 4.0 | 24.2 | n/a |
Triple Point Energy Efficiency Infrastructure | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
US Solar Fund | 2.0 | 3.7 | (6.2) | 8.0 | n/a | n/a |
VH Global Energy Infrastructure PLC | 0.7 | (4.4) | (12.4) | 0.6 | (2.9) | n/a |
Peer group median | 0.2 | (0.0) | (1.1) | 22.0 | 43.1 | 116.2 |
FGEN rank | 19/21 | 10/21 | 12/21 | 2/19 | 4/12 | 4/6 |
Source: Morningstar, Marten & Co
Fund profile
Further information can be found at FGEN.com
FGEN invests in infrastructure projects that use natural or waste resources or support more environmentally-friendly approaches to economic activity, support the transition to a low carbon economy, or mitigate the effects of climate change.
FGEN’s assets are broadly categorised as intermittent renewable energy generation, baseload renewable energy generation (the minimum level of consistent demand for electricity on a power grid over a period of time) and non-energy-generating assets that have environmental benefits. Intermittent energy generation investments include wind, solar and hydropower. Baseload renewable energy generation investments include biomass technologies, anaerobic digestion and bioenergy generated from waste. Non-energy-generating projects include wastewater, waste processing, low carbon transport, battery storage, and sustainable solutions for food production such as agri- and aquaculture projects.
FGEN aims to build a portfolio that is diversified both geographically and by type of asset. This emphasis on diversification reduces the dependency on a single market or set of climatic conditions and helps differentiate FGEN from the majority of its peers, which tend to specialise in solar or wind.
Reflecting its objective of delivering sustainable, progressive dividends and preserving its capital, FGEN does not invest in new or experimental technology. A substantial proportion of its revenues is derived from long-term government subsidies.
FGEN’s AIFM is Foresight Group LLP (Foresight). Foresight is one of the best-resourced investors in renewable infrastructure assets, with £12.6bn of assets under management as at 30 September 2024. This includes Foresight Solar Fund, which sits in FGEN’s listed peer group. Foresight has a highly experienced and well-resourced global infrastructure team with 180 infrastructure professionals managing around 4.7GW of energy infrastructure. It is a global business, with offices in eight countries. The co-lead managers for FGEN are Chris Tanner, Edward Mountney and Charlie Wright.
Previous publications
You can read our previous notes on FGEN by clicking on them in Figure 14 below or by visiting our website.
Figure 14: QuotedData’s previously published notes on FGEN
Title | Note type | Date |
---|---|---|
Diverse renewables exposure | Initiation | 6 September 2017 |
Anaerobic diversification | Update | 6 March 2018 |
Diversification benefits shine through | Annual overview | 12 September 2018 |
Life extensions to boost NAV? | Update | 15 March 2019 |
Battery storage potential | Annual overview | 9 September 2019 |
Reliable source of income | Update | 14 May 2020 |
Increasingly diversified as green-led recovery looms | Annual overview | 16 February 2021 |
On the front foot | Update | 4 August 2021 |
It’s all about renewables | Annual overview | 29 March 2022 |
Further portfolio diversification | Update | 29 September 2022 |
Laying the foundations for NAV growth | Annual overview | 31 March 2023 |
Backing the green hydrogen revolution | Update | 28 November 2023 |
Vote against discontinuation | Annual overview | 17 July 2024 |
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Marten & Co (which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) was paid to produce this note on Foresight Environmental Infrastructure Plc.
This note is for information purposes only and is not intended to encourage the reader to deal in the security or securities mentioned within it. Marten & Co is not authorised to give advice to retail clients. The research does not have regard to the specific investment objectives financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it.
The analysts who prepared this note are not constrained from dealing ahead of it but, in practice, and in accordance with our internal code of good conduct, will refrain from doing so for the period from which they first obtained the information necessary to prepare the note until one month after the note’s publication. Nevertheless, they may have an interest in any of the securities mentioned within this note.
This note has been compiled from publicly available information. This note is not directed at any person in any jurisdiction where (by reason of that person’s nationality, residence or otherwise) the publication or availability of this note is prohibited.
Accuracy of Content: Whilst Marten & Co uses reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources which we believe to be reliable and to ensure that the information in this note is up to date and accurate, we make no representation or warranty that the information contained in this note is accurate, reliable or complete. The information contained in this note is provided by Marten & Co for personal use and information purposes generally. You are solely liable for any use you may make of this information. The information is inherently subject to change without notice and may become outdated. You, therefore, should verify any information obtained from this note before you use it.
No Advice: Nothing contained in this note constitutes or should be construed to constitute investment, legal, tax or other advice.
No Representation or Warranty: No representation, warranty or guarantee of any kind, express or implied is given by Marten & Co in respect of any information contained on this note.
Exclusion of Liability: To the fullest extent allowed by law, Marten & Co shall not be liable for any direct or indirect losses, damages, costs or expenses incurred or suffered by you arising out or in connection with the access to, use of or reliance on any information contained on this note. In no circumstance shall Marten & Co and its employees have any liability for consequential or special damages.
Governing Law and Jurisdiction: These terms and conditions and all matters connected with them, are governed by the laws of England and Wales and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. If you access this note from outside the UK, you are responsible for ensuring compliance with any local laws relating to access.
No information contained in this note shall form the basis of, or be relied upon in connection with, any offer or commitment whatsoever in any jurisdiction.
Investment Performance Information: Please remember that past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future and that the value of shares and the income from them can go down as well as up. Exchange rates may also cause the value of underlying overseas investments to go down as well as up. Marten & Co may write on companies that use gearing in a number of forms that can increase volatility and, in some cases, to a complete loss of an investment.